Screener
LRNZ vs IGV
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
Key differences
- IGV costs 0.30% less per year.
- IGV is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; IGV uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, LRNZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IGV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | IGV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $12.1B |
| Since | 2020 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | -8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +6.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.41% | 25.67% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -45.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and IGV
Explore further