Screener
LRNZ vs IXN
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs iShares Global Tech ETF
Key differences
- IXN costs 0.30% less per year.
- IXN is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ covers north america markets; IXN covers global.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; IXN uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IXN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IXN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | IXN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $7.8B |
| Since | 2020 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +63.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.9% | +35.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | +22.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.77 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.41% | 21.62% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -36.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and IXN
Explore further