Screener
LRNZ vs MOTO
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs Guinness Atkinson Smart Transportation & Technology ETF
Key differences
- LRNZ is significantly larger than MOTO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, LRNZ has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | MOTO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.68% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $10M |
| Since | 2020 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +56.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +21.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | +11.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 21.11% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -38.24% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and MOTO
Explore further