Screener
LRNZ vs VOTE
TrueShares Technology, AI and Deep Learning ETF vs TCW Transform 500 ETF
Key differences
- VOTE costs 0.64% less per year.
- VOTE is significantly larger than LRNZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LRNZ follows a active selection strategy; VOTE uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| LRNZ | VOTE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.69% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $31M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2020 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +35.9% | +30.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +24.3% | +23.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.76 | 1.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | 27.55% | 12.21% |
| Max drawdown | -61.33% | -25.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LRNZ and VOTE
Explore further