Screener
VOTE vs PWRD
TCW Transform 500 ETF vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Key differences
- VOTE costs 0.70% less per year.
- VOTE follows a index tracking strategy; PWRD uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, PWRD has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| VOTE | PWRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.05% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.0B | $1.5B |
| Since | 2021 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.94% | 0.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.9% | +41.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +23.5% | +32.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.23 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.21% | 23.59% |
| Max drawdown | -25.70% | -25.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to VOTE and PWRD
Explore further