Skip to content
Screener

LSAF vs QMOM

LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

LSAF

LeaderSharesTM AlphaFactor US Core Equity ETF

Annual cost

0.75%

Fund size

$114M

QMOM

Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF

Annual cost

0.28%

Fund size

$466M

Key differences

Both LSAF and QMOM are equity ETFs. LSAF charges 0.75% a year and QMOM 0.28%. The main difference: LSAF follows a index enhanced strategy; QMOM uses systematic alpha.

  • LSAF follows a index enhanced strategy; QMOM uses systematic alpha.
  • QMOM costs 0.47% less per year.
  • QMOM is much larger than LSAF. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last three years, QMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

LSAFQMOM
Annual cost (TER)0.75%0.28%
Fund size (AUM)$114M$466M
Since20182015
Dividend yield0.61%0.44%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex enhancedsystematic alpha
CAGR 1Y+26.8%+26.6%
CAGR 3Y+20.0%+21.6%
CAGR 5Y+11.2%+10.7%
Sharpe 3Y1.000.80
Volatility 1Y14.59%24.46%
Max drawdown-41.67%-39.13%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

Similar to LSAF and QMOM