Screener
QMOM vs LSAT
Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF vs LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF
Key differences
Both QMOM and LSAT are equity ETFs. QMOM charges 0.28% a year and LSAT 0.99%. The main difference: QMOM follows a systematic alpha strategy; LSAT uses active selection.
- QMOM follows a systematic alpha strategy; LSAT uses active selection.
- QMOM costs 0.71% less per year.
- QMOM is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, QMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| QMOM | LSAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.28% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $466M | $61M |
| Since | 2015 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.44% | 1.73% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | systematic alpha | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.6% | +11.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +11.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.7% | +6.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.46% | 12.84% |
| Max drawdown | -39.13% | -20.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.