Screener
LSAT vs IMOM
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs Alpha Architect International Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
Both LSAT and IMOM are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and IMOM 0.38%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; IMOM uses systematic alpha.
- LSAT follows a active selection strategy; IMOM uses systematic alpha.
- LSAT covers North America; IMOM covers global markets excluding the US.
- IMOM costs 0.61% less per year.
- Over the last three years, IMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- IMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSAT | IMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $166M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 2.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | +40.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.07 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | 20.49% |
| Max drawdown | -20.48% | -45.74% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.