Screener
LSAT vs QMOM
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs Alpha Architect U.S. Quantitative Momentum ETF
Key differences
Both LSAT and QMOM are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and QMOM 0.28%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; QMOM uses systematic alpha.
- LSAT follows a active selection strategy; QMOM uses systematic alpha.
- QMOM costs 0.71% less per year.
- QMOM is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, QMOM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- QMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSAT | QMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $466M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 0.44% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | +26.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +10.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 0.80 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | 24.46% |
| Max drawdown | -20.48% | -39.13% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.