Screener
LSAT vs INTF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs iShares International Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
Both LSAT and INTF are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and INTF 0.16%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; INTF uses index tracking.
- LSAT follows a active selection strategy; INTF uses index tracking.
- LSAT covers North America; INTF covers global markets excluding the US.
- INTF costs 0.83% less per year.
- INTF is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, INTF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- INTF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSAT | INTF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $3.5B |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 2.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global ex us |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | +25.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +9.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | 15.00% |
| Max drawdown | -20.48% | -40.39% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.