Screener
LSAT vs GLOF
LeaderShares AlphaFactor Tactical Focused ETF vs iShares Global Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
Both LSAT and GLOF are equity ETFs. LSAT charges 0.99% a year and GLOF 0.20%. The main difference: LSAT follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- LSAT follows a active selection strategy; GLOF uses index tracking.
- LSAT covers North America; GLOF covers global markets.
- GLOF costs 0.79% less per year.
- GLOF is much larger than LSAT. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GLOF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GLOF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSAT | GLOF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $61M | $212M |
| Since | 2020 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.73% | 1.50% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +11.6% | +27.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +22.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +6.1% | +11.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.58 | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.84% | 13.14% |
| Max drawdown | -20.48% | -34.12% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.