Screener
LSEQ vs IWB
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 ETF
Key differences
- IWB costs 2.13% less per year.
- IWB is significantly larger than LSEQ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- LSEQ is classified as alternative, while IWB is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- LSEQ follows a long short strategy; IWB uses index tracking.
- IWB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LSEQ | IWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.28% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $15M | $46.2B |
| Since | 2023 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 1.78% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | long short | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +19.7% | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.96% | 12.07% |
| Max drawdown | -8.35% | -34.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LSEQ and IWB
Explore further