Screener
LST vs FDRS
Leuthold Select Industries ETF vs Corgi ETF Trust I
Key differences
- FDRS costs 0.16% less per year.
- LST is classified as equity, while FDRS is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- LST follows a active selection strategy; FDRS uses leveraged.
- LST has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| LST | FDRS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $150M | $77M |
| Since | 2000 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | +33.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.38% | — |
| Max drawdown | -19.47% | -21.64% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to LST and FDRS
Explore further