Screener
MAGG vs HIMU
Madison Aggregate Bond ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
Both MAGG and HIMU are fixed income ETFs. MAGG charges 0.36% a year and HIMU 0.39%. The main difference: HIMU is much larger than MAGG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU is much larger than MAGG. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGG | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.36% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $68M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2023 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 4.73% | 5.14% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.3% | +7.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.95% | 4.45% |
| Max drawdown | -4.55% | -8.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.