Screener
MAGO vs CGHM
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Capital Group Municipal High-Income ETF
Key differences
- CGHM costs 0.65% less per year.
- CGHM is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while CGHM is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; CGHM uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | CGHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.34% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.80% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.11% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -5.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and CGHM
Explore further