Screener
MAGO vs CGMS
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Capital Group U.S. Multi-Sector Income ETF
Key differences
- CGMS costs 0.60% less per year.
- CGMS is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while CGMS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; CGMS uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | CGMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.93% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.92 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.49% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -4.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and CGMS
Explore further