Screener
MAGO vs CGSD
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Capital Group Short Duration Income ETF
Key differences
- CGSD costs 0.74% less per year.
- CGSD is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while CGSD is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; CGSD uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | CGSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $2.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.48% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.70 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.46% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -1.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and CGSD
Explore further