Screener
MAGO vs CRDT
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Simplify Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
- CRDT is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while CRDT is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; CRDT uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | CRDT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.99% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $38M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 6.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -0.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 8.48% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -9.80% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and CRDT
Explore further