Screener
MAGO vs ZHOG
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs F/m Opportunistic Income ETF
Key differences
- ZHOG costs 0.56% less per year.
- ZHOG is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while ZHOG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; ZHOG uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | ZHOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.43% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $45M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.60% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.61% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -3.66% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and ZHOG
Explore further