Screener
MAGO vs IG
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.80% less per year.
- IG is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; IG uses active selection.
- IG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $179M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.06% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and IG
Explore further