Screener
MAGO vs MUSI
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs American Century Multisector Income ETF
Key differences
- MUSI costs 0.61% less per year.
- MUSI is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while MUSI is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; MUSI uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | MUSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $214M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.74% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +6.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.35% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -13.91% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and MUSI
Explore further