Screener
MAGO vs TUA
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Simplify Short Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- TUA costs 0.74% less per year.
- TUA is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; TUA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | TUA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $802M |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.63% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | -1.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.58 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.85% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -15.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and TUA
Explore further