Screener
MAGO vs TYA
Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF vs Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
Key differences
- TYA costs 0.74% less per year.
- TYA is significantly larger than MAGO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAGO is classified as alternative, while TYA is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MAGO follows a option income strategy; TYA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAGO | TYA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.99% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2M | $67M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +3.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -4.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.04% |
| Max drawdown | -17.98% | -51.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAGO and TYA
Explore further