Screener
MANI vs FEMR
Man Active Income ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
MANI is an alternative ETF, while FEMR is an equity ETF. MANI charges 0.01% a year and FEMR 0.38%.
- MANI is an alternative fund, while FEMR is an equity fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MANI costs 0.37% less per year.
- FEMR is much larger than MANI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MANI | FEMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $20M | $135M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.44% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +52.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.83% |
| Max drawdown | -0.73% | -15.58% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.