Screener
MANI vs XFLX
Man Active Income ETF vs FundX Flexible ETF
Key differences
- MANI is classified as alternative, while XFLX is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- MANI follows a long short strategy; XFLX uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MANI | XFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $49M |
| Since | — | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 9.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +5.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.53% |
| Max drawdown | -0.73% | -6.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MANI and XFLX
Explore further