Screener
MANI vs XNAV
Man Active Income ETF vs FundX Aggressive ETF
Key differences
- MANI follows a long short strategy; XNAV uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MANI | XNAV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 1.27% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $31M |
| Since | — | 2002 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.51% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | long short | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +44.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +25.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 16.54% |
| Max drawdown | -0.73% | -24.27% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MANI and XNAV
Explore further