Screener
MARS vs IGM
Roundhill Space & Technology ETF vs iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF
Key differences
Both MARS and IGM are equity ETFs. MARS charges 0.75% a year and IGM 0.39%. The main difference: MARS follows a active selection strategy; IGM uses index tracking.
- MARS follows a active selection strategy; IGM uses index tracking.
- IGM costs 0.36% less per year.
- IGM is much larger than MARS. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MARS | IGM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $101M | $11.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.13% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +48.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +36.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +20.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 21.46% |
| Max drawdown | -24.52% | -40.68% |
Similar to MARS and IGM
Explore further