Screener
MATE vs CEW
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs WisdomTree Emerging Currency Strategy Fund
Key differences
MATE is an alternative ETF, while CEW is a fixed income ETF. MATE charges 0.97% a year and CEW 0.55%.
- MATE is an alternative fund, while CEW is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; CEW uses active selection.
- CEW costs 0.42% less per year.
- CEW has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | CEW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $39M | $16M |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.40% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.54 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 6.36% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -17.72% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.