Screener
MATE vs MSMR
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs McElhenny Sheffield Managed Risk ETF
Key differences
- MATE costs 0.09% less per year.
- MSMR is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MATE is classified as alternative, while MSMR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MATE covers emerging markets markets; MSMR covers north america.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; MSMR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | MSMR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $166M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.88% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +26.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 12.02% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -14.86% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and MSMR
Explore further