Screener
MATE vs REMG
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- REMG costs 0.33% less per year.
- MATE is classified as alternative, while REMG is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $95M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and REMG
Explore further