Screener
MATE vs EMOP
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF
Key differences
- EMOP costs 0.27% less per year.
- EMOP is significantly larger than MATE — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MATE is classified as alternative, while EMOP is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; EMOP uses active selection.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | EMOP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 0.70% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2025 | 1995 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.64% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -12.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and EMOP
Explore further