Screener
MATE vs WZRD
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- MATE is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MATE covers emerging markets markets; WZRD covers north america.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $4M |
| Since | 2025 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -71.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and WZRD
Explore further