Screener
MATE vs FORH
Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF vs Formidable ETF
Key differences
- MATE costs 0.22% less per year.
- MATE follows a tactical allocation strategy; FORH uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| MATE | FORH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.97% | 1.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $37M | $20M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 1.73% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | tactical allocation | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.08 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -13.24% | -20.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MATE and FORH
Explore further