Screener
MAVF vs DFAU
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFAU costs 0.63% less per year.
- DFAU is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $11.5B |
| Since | 1996 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +13.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 12.21% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -23.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and DFAU
Explore further