Screener
MAVF vs DFUV
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
Key differences
- DFUV costs 0.54% less per year.
- DFUV is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | DFUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.21% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $14.4B |
| Since | 1996 | 1998 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +19.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.05 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 11.87% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -17.60% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and DFUV
Explore further