Screener
MAVF vs FVAL
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Fidelity Value Factor ETF
Key differences
- FVAL costs 0.60% less per year.
- FVAL is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF follows a active selection strategy; FVAL uses index tracking.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | FVAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $1.2B |
| Since | 1996 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.0% | +33.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | 11.71% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -37.26% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and FVAL
Explore further