Screener
MAVF vs FFLV
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap
Key differences
- FFLV costs 0.37% less per year.
- MAVF is significantly larger than FFLV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF covers north america markets; FFLV covers global.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | FFLV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.38% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $17M |
| Since | 1996 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.48% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +38.0% | +29.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.03% | 11.50% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -16.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and FFLV
Explore further