Screener
MAVF vs GSSC
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta U.S. Small Cap Equity ETF
Key differences
- GSSC costs 0.55% less per year.
- GSSC is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF follows a active selection strategy; GSSC uses index tracking.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | GSSC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $952M |
| Since | 1996 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.10% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +31.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 18.61% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -41.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and GSSC
Explore further