Screener
MAVF vs GVUS
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Goldman Sachs MarketBeta Russell 1000 Value Equity ETF
Key differences
- GVUS costs 0.63% less per year.
- GVUS is significantly larger than MAVF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MAVF follows a active selection strategy; GVUS uses index tracking.
- MAVF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MAVF | GVUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $91M | $399M |
| Since | 1996 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.23% | 1.64% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.0% | +28.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.06% | 10.95% |
| Max drawdown | -14.87% | -15.82% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MAVF and GVUS
Explore further