Screener
MBBA vs BINC
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- MBBA costs 0.15% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than MBBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MBBA follows a index tracking strategy; BINC uses active selection.
- MBBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBBA | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $125M | $16.9B |
| Since | 1998 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 3.98% | 5.60% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -2.83% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBBA and BINC
Explore further