Screener
MBBA vs SECU
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF vs iShares Securitized Income Active ETF
Key differences
- MBBA costs 0.15% less per year.
- SECU is significantly larger than MBBA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MBBA is classified as fixed income, while SECU is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- MBBA follows a index tracking strategy; SECU uses multi strategy.
- MBBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBBA | SECU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $125M | $592M |
| Since | 1998 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 3.98% | 4.99% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -2.83% | -1.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBBA and SECU
Explore further