Screener
MBBA vs JHMB
iShares Mortgage-Backed Securities Active ETF vs John Hancock Mortgage Backed Securities ETF
Key differences
- MBBA costs 0.14% less per year.
- MBBA follows a index tracking strategy; JHMB uses active selection.
- MBBA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MBBA | JHMB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $125M | $216M |
| Since | 1998 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 3.98% | 4.72% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.24 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 3.92% |
| Max drawdown | -2.83% | -14.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MBBA and JHMB
Explore further