Screener
MCDS vs JAVA
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Mid Core ETF vs JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Key differences
- MCDS costs 0.09% less per year.
- JAVA is significantly larger than MCDS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- MCDS follows a index tracking strategy; JAVA uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCDS | JAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.44% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $8M | $6.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.10% | 1.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +20.9% | +23.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.36% | 11.30% |
| Max drawdown | -20.53% | -16.54% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCDS and JAVA
Explore further