Screener
MCHI vs EEMA
iShares MSCI China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
Both MCHI and EEMA are equity ETFs. MCHI charges 0.59% a year and EEMA 0.49%. The main difference: EEMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- EEMA costs 0.10% less per year.
- MCHI is much larger than EEMA. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, EEMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHI | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.3B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2011 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.30% | 1.18% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +1.6% | +43.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +10.9% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.8% | +5.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.38 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.20% | 21.37% |
| Max drawdown | -62.84% | -44.18% |
Similar to MCHI and EEMA
Explore further