Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

MCHI vs GXC

iShares MSCI China ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

MCHI

iShares MSCI China ETF

iShares

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$6.7B

GXC

State Street SPDR S&P China ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.59%

Fund size

$479M

Key differences

  • MCHI is significantly larger than GXC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.

Side-by-side comparison

MCHIGXC
Annual cost (TER)0.59%0.59%
Fund size (AUM)$6.7B$479M
Since20112007
Dividend yield2.21%2.45%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyindex trackingindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+3.5%+10.7%
CAGR 3Y+9.1%+9.8%
CAGR 5Y-5.0%-3.9%
Sharpe 3Y0.330.36
Volatility 1Y20.00%18.74%
Max drawdown-62.84%-60.23%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to MCHI and GXC