Screener
MCHI vs URTH
iShares MSCI China ETF vs iShares MSCI World ETF
Key differences
- URTH costs 0.35% less per year.
- MCHI covers emerging markets markets; URTH covers global.
- Over the last 3 years, URTH has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| MCHI | URTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.24% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $6.7B | $9.2B |
| Since | 2011 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 1.40% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.5% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +9.1% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | -5.0% | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.33 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.00% | 12.17% |
| Max drawdown | -62.84% | -34.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MCHI and URTH
Explore further