Screener
MDAA vs GDMA
Myriad Dynamic Asset Allocation ETF vs Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF
Key differences
MDAA is a mixed asset ETF, while GDMA is an alternative ETF. MDAA charges 0.01% a year and GDMA 0.75%.
- MDAA is a mixed asset fund, while GDMA is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- MDAA follows a active selection strategy; GDMA uses multi strategy.
- MDAA costs 0.74% less per year.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MDAA | GDMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.01% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $459M | $204M |
| Since | 2025 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.59% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | alternative |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +28.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.16 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.39% |
| Max drawdown | -14.59% | -16.66% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.