Screener
GDMA vs MKAM
Gadsden Dynamic Multi-Asset ETF vs Mkam Etf
Key differences
Both GDMA and MKAM are alternative ETFs. GDMA charges 0.75% a year and MKAM 0.53%. The main difference: GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; MKAM uses active selection.
- GDMA follows a multi strategy strategy; MKAM uses active selection.
- MKAM costs 0.22% less per year.
- GDMA is much larger than MKAM. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, GDMA has delivered higher annualized returns.
- GDMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| GDMA | MKAM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.75% | 0.53% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $204M | $13M |
| Since | 2018 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 2.59% | 2.90% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | multi strategy | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.3% | +11.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.3% | +9.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.3% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.16 | 0.96 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.39% | 6.24% |
| Max drawdown | -16.66% | -5.01% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.