Screener
MEAR vs GUMI
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs Goldman Sachs Ultra Short Municipal Income ETF
Key differences
Both MEAR and GUMI are fixed income ETFs. MEAR charges 0.26% a year and GUMI 0.16%. The main difference: GUMI costs 0.10% less per year.
- GUMI costs 0.10% less per year.
- MEAR is much larger than GUMI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- MEAR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | GUMI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.4B | $40M |
| Since | 2015 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.86% | 2.80% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +3.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.07 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 1.09% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -0.48% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.