Screener
MEAR vs HIMU
iShares Short Maturity Municipal Bond Active ETF vs iShares High Yield Muni Active ETF
Key differences
- MEAR costs 0.13% less per year.
- MEAR follows a active selection strategy; HIMU uses index tracking.
- HIMU has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| MEAR | HIMU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.3B | $2.1B |
| Since | 2015 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 2.87% | 5.16% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +3.3% | +6.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | +3.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.02 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 0.86% | 4.92% |
| Max drawdown | -2.68% | -8.01% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to MEAR and HIMU
Explore further